Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
Sign In

English Language

:

TC 30-Sep-2010 :Graphical SummaryUse SHIFT+ENTER to open the menu (new window).Open MenuOpen Menu

Teleconference on SDTM Validation & traceability between SDTM and ADaM.
Respond to this Survey Respond to this Survey
   
View: 

1. Do you feel the teleconference was relevant to you?

 Yes
 23 (100%)  
 No
 0 (0%)  
Total: 23

2. How would you rate the quality of presentation overall?

 Excellent
 11 (48%) 
 
 Good
 12 (52%) 
 
 Fair
 0 (0%)  
 Poor
 0 (0%)  
Total: 23

3. How would you rate the presentation content?

 Excellent
 6 (27%) 
 
 Good
 14 (64%) 
 
 Fair
 1 (5%) 
 
 Poor
 1 (5%) 
 
Total: 22

4. How would you rate the enrollment & confirmation for the TC?

 Excellent
 16 (73%) 
 
 Good
 5 (23%) 
 
 Fair
 1 (5%) 
 
 Poor
 0 (0%)  
Total: 22

5. How would you rate the quality of the TC service?

 Excellent
 14 (61%) 
 
 Good
 9 (39%) 
 
 Fair
 0 (0%)  
 Poor
 0 (0%)  
Total: 23

6. Any suggestions for improvement for the next teleconference?

 
 17 (74%) 
 
 
ADaM was interesting but linear approach would be more common. and useful.
 1 (4%) 
 
 
The 2nd .ppt was a repeat of the same presentation conducted at Interchage (or copied large chunks)......we need to ensure we are getting new and novel material as oppose to repeats.
 1 (4%) 
 
 Both livemeeting and TC worked well.
 1 (4%) 
 
 
None.
 1 (4%) 
 
 
It felt a little bit too much of "sales pitch" sometimes, otherwise it was interesting.
 1 (4%) 
 
 
 
 1 (4%) 
 
Total: 23

7. Any other feedback or comment?

 
First presentation was more relavent to me than the second, but the 2 presentations were a good mix to get both data management and analysis programmers into the call.
 1 (4%) 
 
 
 14 (61%) 
 
 
Unfortunately the presentation titles were the most interesting part of the TC.  Practical examples are more useful than a sale pitch
 1 (4%) 
 
 
Confusion re whether Webex or Livemeeting - not the same thing so we joined late as software installed.
 1 (4%) 
 
 
Good to join in with you again - JH ;-)
 1 (4%) 
 
 Content and quality of presentations was high, and relevant to my job role. B&D provided excellent insight, and some good solid numbers regarding FTE effort for the tasks undertaken. Many thanks.
 1 (4%) 
 
 
This was my first ESUG meeting that I attended, and this time both presentations came from a CRO. I'm hoping that in the future we will see what other sponsors are doing as well.
 1 (4%) 
 
 
SDTM validation and SDTM to ADaM is extremely relevant to many peoples daily activities, very useful indeed. 
 1 (4%) 
 
 
There are broader experiences in the industry when interacting with the agencies. Perhaps more than one comany could have been included in the presentations.
 1 (4%) 
 
 
The presentations were very interesting and a link to them would be very helpful. 
 1 (4%) 
 
Total: 23

8. Content Type

Total: 0